If anyone at the Federal Trade Commission is bored today, feel free to reach out — my household may have another ready-made case against Amazon for you.
Hope you enjoy this journey as much as we’ve hated it:
We aren’t alone in experiencing this — and won’t hold our breath that this “note” will do the trick.
This saga, though frustrating, isn’t shared to grind an ax; it’s just another view on the kind of chicanery Amazon’s already defending in court.
In June, the FTC sued Amazon for fooling customers into signing up for its $15/month Amazon Prime service and intentionally making it difficult to cancel, per Ars Technica.
The FTC’s complaint revealed that Amazon internally called its cancellation process “Iliad,” a nod to Homer’s ~15.7k-line epic, and accused Amazon leadership of slowing or rejecting changes that’d help customers navigate the “labyrinthine” Iliad.
Per the FTC, the “nonconsensual enrollment problem was well known within Amazon.”
Our takeaway: Skulduggery like this at least explains why Amazon’s legal chief made $18.2m — or 3.46m months of Amazon Music Unlimited — last year. That’s one busy man.